The insurance industry may be slowly attempting to turn around its image of having a lack of diversity in the industry, but now it has been dealt a new blow as it has been suggested that policyholders may be being punished because they live in areas with a higher density of minority ethnic households.
A report, co-written by former equality commissioner Trevor Phillips, and reported on in The Guardian
, suggests that policyholders are paying an effective ‘ethnic penalty’ as high as £450 a year as it points to a statistical link between the proportion of minority ethnic households in an area and the cost of car insurance – adding that the link applies to both well-off and poorer areas.
In its conclusion it states that the manner in which insurers calculate premiums “has definitely produced an inequality of outcome to the detriment of black and minority ethnic groups.”
Overall, the study suggests that additional costs affect around 12 million people irrespective of ethnic origin. It draws on data from the AA for all 124 postcode areas across the UK and states that there is around a 60% variation in average premiums, which in some cases rises as high as 90%, which may be accounted for by the difference in ethnic composition.
Explaining that some people might conclude there is a link between ethnic minorities living in high crime areas it states “this explanation is hard to sustain” pointing out that Indian-heritage Britons are economically almost indistinguishable from white Britons and in fact are slightly more likely to have high skilled jobs.
The report, published by Webber Phillips, has been met with anger by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) which responded by stating the report makes “serious accusations using a flawed analysis” and was put together “by people with no understanding of how car insurers price their policies.”
quotes James Dalton, the director of general insurance policy at the ABI, rejecting the findings.
“Car insurers have never and will never set prices based on ethnicity, as it is ethically wrong and prohibited by the 2010 Equality Act. Premiums are higher in certain parts of the country because claims costs are higher in certain parts of the country,” he said.
“This report was compiled without any consultation with the insurance industry, by people with no understanding of how car insurers price their policies, and was paid for by a firm of solicitors with a vested interest in fuelling the compensation culture.”
What do you make of the report’s findings? Leave a comment below with your thoughts.
How to get young people into the insurance business