New York regulator may ban insurers from using occupational data

New York regulator may ban insurers from using occupational data

New York regulator may ban insurers from using occupational data What personal data should insurers be allowed to use to price premiums?

This question has been raised in New York, as a regulator is said to be considering prohibiting auto-insurers from using consumers’ occupations to price their policies.

The New York Department of Financial Services has asked a group of insurers – including Allstate, Geico, Liberty Mutual and Progressive – to explain why the practice should not be prohibited, the Wall Street Journal reports.

The proposal has reignited a debate that has rumbled on for years, as regulators, insurers and consumer advocates disagree over what data should and should not be considered in the pricing of insurance policies.

“As long as state governments require drivers to buy insurance, they should require insurance companies to price their product based on how we drive, not who we are,” J. Robert Hunter, the Consumer Federation of America’s insurance director, told the WSJ.

But an official with the trade group Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, Alex Hageli, said that insurers’ ability to assess a range of factors results in increased availability of insurance for drivers, as insurers naturally want to use “accurate predictors of loss.”

An Allstate representative told the WSJ: “Drivers less likely to incur losses should pay less for insurance than drivers more likely to incur losses.”

A spokesman for Liberty Mutual said the company was working “productively” with the Department of Financial Services, “just as we would on any issue related to auto insurance regulation in New York.”

Some states already have limits on the use of data in pricing insurance, including Massachusetts in which insurers are banned from using information on occupation or education in setting rates.

Geico faced a federal lawsuit in 2006, which alleged that the company’s use of education and employment status as a factor in determining prices constituted discrimination.

A judge denied the suit class-action status, finding that the insurer “continually re-evaluates its occupational categories and moves occupations from one group to another,” and the case was eventually dropped.

What is your opinion on occupational data being used to price insurance premiums? Leave a comment below with your thoughts.

Related stories:
US finalizes legislation on “quiet cars” 
More tech and no rewards for car insurance customers 
  • Jim 11/17/2016 10:38:03 AM
    Premiums should be determined based on where you live and your driving history. Job and personal credit status should not be a consideration in determining premium.
    Post a reply
  • Wayne 11/17/2016 10:52:21 AM
    I agree with what Jim said. After 44 years in the business I also don't see that students with B average are any better risks than ones that don't have a B average.
    Post a reply
  • Davenport 11/17/2016 11:19:46 AM
    Your occupation does matter. Real estate agents, for example, typically spend a great deal of time on the road and their auto would carry the higher business use classification. Would insurance companies have to throw out the business use classification? Beyond that, I am a capitalist pig and feel like insurers should be able to run their business however they see fit with as little regulation as possible. To do otherwise is government overreach. Let the free market decide.
    Post a reply