Insurance Business forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Notify me of new replies via email
Insurance Business | 03 Dec 2014, 11:56 a.m. Agree 0
An intermediated insurer is taking pride in its leading position on resolving and settling Christchurch earthquake residential claims.
  • hoover | 03 Dec 2014, 01:34 p.m. Agree 0
    give us the actual numbers Jimmy, how many claims. The Vero domestic book would be quite small so they should have more settled by now compared to the industry. No comment on Vero's stance on BI & depopulation and mishandling early on in the piece
  • Ars | 03 Dec 2014, 08:03 p.m. Agree 0
    90% target 5 years after the event is shameful. Given insurers admit to leaving the worst affected till last this constitutes a shocking personal, emotional, financial and health cost to the families left waiting for years.
  • dave | 03 Dec 2014, 11:40 p.m. Agree 0
    people should stop getting fannied about and just sue the insurance companies the outstanding claims are the most expensive entitlements for the IC to pay out and they have kept these more costly claims till last while they brag their statistics. Waiting for over 4 years did anyone expect an insurer to take the piss for that long?
  • Pants on Fire | 04 Dec 2014, 05:39 a.m. Agree 0
    Jimmy, "settled" does not mean that the repairs or rebuilds have actually been done, so your claim that you have "paid out" 80+% does not ring true. Just ask your claimants who are still waiting.
Post a reply