The panel called the crash "the straw that broke the camel's back"
A missing baseline ultrasound appears to have cost the insurer its threshold argument
The insured firm had already collapsed - leaving its PI insurer to face the claim
Exaggeration claims, cross-cultural questions, and a critical 10% threshold in play
The ruling exposes a PI coverage gap insurers and brokers can't ignore
Fire forensics came up empty - so how did Chubb prove its case?
The insurers had the expert report for years - and never cross-examined its author
A review panel slashed a passenger's WPI from 17% to 5% - then the court stepped in
A broker playbook for spotting water exposures