Kazakhstan generates more economic output than any other country in Central Asia, yet not a single foreign insurance company operates within its borders through a direct branch. A draft regulatory reform proposes to change that – and the timing, set against a global market where carriers are actively seeking growth, gives the announcement sharper commercial relevance than its regulatory language might first suggest.
The Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market and the National Bank jointly prepared a draft Insurance Market Development Program through 2030, which proposes removing two of the conditions that have kept international insurers out of the direct-branch market: a $5 billion minimum asset requirement and a rule mandating at least 10 years of operating experience across all insurance classes, according to DKNews.kz.
Read next: Willis Towers Watson opens in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan’s nominal GDP is projected to reach $320 billion in 2026, making it the only Central Asian state represented in the global top 50 economies, according to the IMF. Despite that standing, the insurance sector’s footprint relative to the broader economy remains limited. A 2024 World Bank Financial Sector Assessment found that Kazakhstan’s insurance sector total assets stood at just over 2% of GDP, noting the sector had grown significantly since 2016 but remained relatively small.
The market reported total assets of 3.9 trillion tenge (US$7.9 billion) in 2025, with insurance premiums growing 12.5% year-on-year to 1.7 trillion tenge (US$3.4 billion), driven mainly by voluntary personal and property insurance, according to the Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market. Nine of the 25 operating companies have foreign participation, but all are locally incorporated entities – legally distinct from a foreign branch operating directly in the market. There are currently no foreign insurance branches in Kazakhstan.
The US Department of State’s 2025 Investment Climate Statement for Kazakhstan notes there are no formal constraints on the participation of foreign capital in the insurance sector, but that Kazakhstan’s laws limit the participation of offshore companies in insurance companies. That distinction – permissible foreign capital versus permissible foreign branch structures – is precisely the gap the draft reform addresses. For reference, total insurance penetration averaged 6.2% of GDP among OECD countries in 2024, according to the OECD’s Global Insurance Market Trends 2025. Kazakhstan’s implied premium-to-GDP ratio sits well below that benchmark, reflecting the headroom the market's own regulators are working to close.
The draft program does not propose unconditional access. The $5 billion asset floor remains in force until formal amendments are enacted, and the program does not specify a replacement figure. What it proposes is a structural shift in how eligibility is determined. Rather than relying on a single size-based metric, regulators would evaluate applicants across a broader range of criteria: the parent company’s financial stability and capital adequacy, international credit rating, ownership transparency, quality of corporate governance and risk management, and the effectiveness of supervision in the applicant’s home jurisdiction.
AM Best’s rating process provides a comprehensive analysis of balance sheet strength, operating performance, business profile, and enterprise risk management, according to the agency’s published rating methodology. Under Kazakhstan’s proposed framework, insurers rated A- or above by an internationally recognised agency would qualify for a simplified licensing procedure – shifting the emphasis from total asset size toward those financial quality criteria. Documentation already filed with group-level reporting, or already available to a home regulator, may not need to be resubmitted in Kazakhstan, provided the local regulator can independently verify it.
An A- rating would not, however, guarantee a license. The regulator retains the right to request additional information, impose conditions, or reject applications where it identifies material regulatory risks. Once licensed, foreign branches would operate on the same footing as domestic insurers – subject to Kazakhstan’s solvency rules, disclosure obligations, asset and liability requirements, and consumer protection frameworks.
The reform lands at a moment when international insurers are looking for growth opportunities. Aon’s Q2 2025 Global Insurance Market Overview reported that insurers in Asia were “keenly supporting new opportunities to win business as they aim to deliver premium growth in a softening market,” with new and existing capacity driving a competitive environment. Joe Peiser, Aon’s chief executive officer of Risk Capital, said in the same report that insurers were more flexible on terms and more willing to engage with insureds on coverage enhancements and limits.
For brokers, the practical implications are direct. The shift from a size-based to a quality-based eligibility framework expands the range of carriers that could enter Kazakhstan directly – specifically those meeting the A- threshold on financial strength, governance, and capital adequacy grounds rather than simply on total assets. Understanding which carrier relationships could become newly viable for Kazakhstan placements is groundwork brokers can begin now, before any legislation is enacted.
Insurance payouts in Kazakhstan climbed 38.1% in 2025 to 461.4 billion tenge (US$935.3 million), largely driven by a sharp rise in property insurance claims. Rising claims in a fast-growing premium market raise legitimate questions about whether a concentrated domestic carrier base is sufficient to meet demand at scale – a structural tension the reform is designed to address over time.
The foreign branch liberalization is one element of a broader program. The draft 2030 plan also covers changes to compulsory and voluntary insurance lines, digitalization, pension-linked products, actuarial infrastructure, and financial stability requirements. Kazakhstan additionally plans to establish an independent Central Actuary to calculate and review compulsory insurance tariffs. The regulatory direction is clear: Kazakhstan is moving away from balance-sheet size as the primary market-access criterion, toward financial quality measures – credit ratings, capital adequacy, ownership transparency, and governance standards. Whether that translates into new foreign branch entrants will depend on the final legislative text, and in particular on what threshold, if any, replaces the current $5 billion floor. The draft program has not yet been enacted.
