Six South Korean insurers have already failed to meet a solvency threshold that does not formally take effect until 2027. A hybrid bond that just attracted nearly 1.5 times its target explains precisely why that gap matters – and why brokers should not read headline solvency ratios at face value. Kyobo Life Insurance drew 446 billion won in institutional orders on August 24 for a 300 billion won hybrid bond – the insurer’s first such issuance in two years – according to investment banking sources cited by the Seoul Economic Daily. The final issue size is expected to land between 300 billion won and 400 billion won. The indicative interest rate band was set at 4.80% to 5.40%, with the final rate expected to be 5.35% if the base size is confirmed. Shinhan Securities, Korea Investment & Securities, and NH Investment & Securities are acting as lead managers. Kyobo Securities, SK Securities, Daishin Securities, and Meritz Securities are participating in the underwriting syndicate.
Read next: Kyobo Life net profit hits 752.3 billion won
The bookbuilding comes at a time when access to capital securities has narrowed sharply across the Korean insurance sector. Subordinated bond issuance by Korean insurers has fallen from 3.9 trillion won in 2025 to just 100 billion won so far in 2026, according to Korea Securities Depository (KSD) data cited by the Seoul Economic Daily. Heungkuk Fire & Marine Insurance is the only insurer to have completed a public subordinated bond issuance this year.
The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has prioritized core capital over supplementary instruments due to its higher loss-absorbing capacity. That is the direct cause of the near-total collapse in issuance. In that context, Kyobo’s 1.5x oversubscription is a data point about issuer quality, not market confidence in the sector. Domestic credit rating agencies assign Kyobo Life’s hybrid bonds an “AA0, stable” rating – the highest among insurers that have issued capital securities this year, on par with DB Insurance, per the Seoul Economic Daily. The insurer reported consolidated operating profit of 975.9 billion won for the first half of 2026, up 23% year-on-year, and net profit of 729.1 billion won, a 22% increase.
Kyobo Life says the hybrid bond proceeds will be used to stabilize its K-ICS ratio – the regulatory measure of an insurer’s claims-paying capacity, calculated as available capital divided by required capital. Reading that ratio requires care. Kyobo Life’s 2025 Sustainability Report discloses a K-ICS ratio of 220.8%, with the pre-transitional measures figure at 164.2% – a gap of 56.6 percentage points attributable entirely to regulatory transitional relief that will phase out over time. As of end-March 2026, Kyobo Life Insurance recorded a K-ICS ratio of 214.2%, down 11.7 percentage points from the previous quarter – a decline that runs counter to the sector-wide trend. The FSS reported the industry-wide K-ICS ratio, after applying transitional measures, stood at 216.1% at end-March 2026, up 3.8 percentage points from the prior quarter. Because hybrid bonds are classified as equity for accounting purposes, issuing them raises available capital and, by extension, the K-ICS ratio – explaining why an insurer with a declining ratio moves to issue now. However, it is a mechanism with a defined expiry.
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) will introduce a minimum core capital ratio for insurers from 2027 under K-ICS, requiring insurers to hold core capital equal to at least 50% of required capital. Core capital will consist of instruments such as paid-in capital and retained earnings, rather than hybrid or debt instruments. The hybrid bonds Kyobo Life is now issuing will not count toward that new core capital measure. Kyobo Life’s own core capital K-ICS ratio is not publicly disclosed in English-language filings – a gap that itself warrants attention from brokers seeking to assess the insurer’s preparedness for the 2027 rule.
Fitch Ratings has flagged the asymmetric impact of the regulation. “Large-sized insurers could have the capacity to increase their core capital due to their stronger financial positions and broader access to capital markets. However, mid-sized and smaller insurers could face significant challenges in meeting these core capital requirements,” said Sue Kim, associate director at Fitch Ratings,” as reported by (Re)in Asia.
As of the end of June 2026, six South Korean insurers reported basic-capital K-ICS ratios below the 50% benchmark: three life insurers – Hana Life, KDB Life, and iM Life – and three property and casualty insurers – Hana Insurance, Heungkuk Fire & Marine Insurance, and Lotte Insurance. Hana Life’s ratio fell 6.63 percentage points to 14.26% in the second quarter, according to Korean financial industry data. The figures highlight the pressure facing smaller and mid-sized insurers that have relied more heavily on supplementary capital as they prepare for the new basic-capital requirements.
Under South Korea’s K-ICS framework, insurers must maintain a solvency ratio of at least 100%, while regulators use 130% as a recommended level. From 2027, insurers will also be subject to a new basic-capital K-ICS standard of 50%, although a nine-year transitional period through 2035 will allow insurers below that level to progressively strengthen their basic-capital positions. An insurer can therefore report a headline K-ICS ratio comfortably above the 100% regulatory minimum while having a substantially weaker basic-capital ratio.
For brokers placing business with Korean carriers, Kyobo Life’s hybrid bond transaction illustrates precisely the kind of capital action that a well-rated insurer can still execute – and that many of its peers cannot. The more important question for counterparty due diligence is not the headline K-ICS ratio but the split between supplementary and core capital within it. Where that core capital figure is not publicly disclosed in English, brokers should treat the absence of disclosure as a material gap, not a clean bill of health.
