Binance hit by "largest bank heist in human history" as withdrawals frozen worldwide

Crypto shares plummet as North Korean hackers are being blamed for the largest crypto theft ever – insurance fund highly unlikely to be able to cover massive losses
Binance hit by "largest bank heist in human history" as withdrawals frozen worldwide
CYBER
By Matthew Sellers
30 Oct 2026

Binance has frozen deposits and withdrawals for its 335 million users while it investigates a breach it now puts at US$6.3 billion. That is more than four times the previous record for a crypto theft.

The exchange paused withdrawals at around 9.15am AEDT today, as users reported funds draining from its hot wallets. “It does look like a hack on Binance,” co-founder Changpeng Zhao posted on X shortly afterwards.

Binance’s preliminary investigation points to one compromised laptop belonging to a DevOps engineer. The exchange says the attacker used the laptop to reach an internal service and submit unauthorised withdrawals. Binance says it has found no evidence that wallet private keys were leaked, although at least one security firm has questioned that account. Binance has promised to cover all losses from its Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) and from company funds. Withdrawals will stay suspended until its security checks are complete.

What we know so far

  • Funds frozen. About US$3 billion has been frozen with help from industry partners.
    • Tether: roughly US$1.57 billion
    • Circle: more than US$800 million
    • Ripple: around US$200 million
    • Arbitrum Security Council: a further US$30.5 million
  • Funds still loose. That leaves around US$3.3 billion outstanding. Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, told CNBC that about US$2.4 billion in bitcoin and ether is still under the attacker’s control. Unlike stablecoins, no issuer can freeze those coins.
  • Attribution. Blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs has attributed the attack to TraderTraitor. The FBI blamed the same North Korean group for the US$1.5 billion Bybit theft in February 2025. “This was absolutely North Korea,” TRM senior investigator Nick Carlsen told The Wall Street Journal. Redbord told the paper it was the largest bank heist “in human history”.
  • Markets. Bitcoin fell more than 3% to a six-week low in early Asian trading, Reuters reported. BNB, Binance’s own token, dropped between 5% and 8%.
  • Unaffected platforms. Binance.US and Coinbase both say they are not affected.

Read next: ASIC’s urgent letter puts insurers and brokers on notice: AI has changed the cyber threat landscape

A self-insured loss nobody could place

Binance is paying for this loss itself. SAFU was set up in 2018 and is owned and managed by the exchange. It is held entirely in bitcoin and is worth roughly US$1 billion to US$1.2 billion, depending on the coin’s price. That covers less than a fifth of the estimated loss, so the rest has to come from Binance’s balance sheet.

Binance has done this before, on a much smaller scale. In 2019 it covered a US$40 million bitcoin theft from its own funds and kept withdrawals shut for about a week. Today’s loss is more than 150 times larger.

Specialist crypto insurers such as Evertas have expanded capacity this year, and WTW has bought its way into the market. Even so, nothing in the specialist market’s publicly reported capacity comes even close to a single loss of this size.

Freezing funds also does not mean recovering them. Redbord told CNBC that getting frozen stablecoins back to their owners usually requires legal proceedings, and there is no standard timeline.

Read next: Gallagher rolls out insurance to safeguard Australian fintechs in crypto space

Why Australian brokers should pay attention

Binance has history with Australian regulators. ASIC cancelled the licence of its local derivatives arm in April 2023. In March this year the Federal Court ordered that business to pay a A$10 million penalty for misclassifying retail clients as wholesale investors. Binance has not yet said how today’s suspension affects Australian customers.

The timing also matters for the local market. The Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Act 2026 passed Parliament in April and commences on 9 April 2027. It brings exchanges and custodians into the AFSL regime. Marsh has outlined what the regime means for firms now seeking licences. Many of those firms will be in the market for crime, specie, cyber, PI and D&O cover over the next 18 months, just as underwriters are absorbing the largest crypto loss on record.

The North Korean link raises a question about exclusions. Under Lloyd’s Market Bulletin Y5381, standalone cyber policies written at Lloyd’s since 31 March 2023 must exclude war and certain state-backed attacks. The bulletin focuses on attacks that significantly impair a state’s ability to function or its security capabilities. It also requires policies to set out how an attack will be attributed. A theft from a private exchange looks hard to bring within that test. However, wordings differ, and claims teams will read their clauses closely before relying on any exclusion.

The way the attacker got in is also familiar. Last month the Australian Cyber Security Centre and international partners warned that North Korean operators are targeting IT professionals with fake job offers in order to compromise their machines.

Read next: Organized fraud is outgrowing Asia-Pacific’s cyber insurance market

What brokers can do now

  • Check wordings. Review war, state-backed attack and social engineering clauses on any digital asset, fintech or payments clients.
  • Expect tougher renewal questions. Underwriters are likely to ask about:
    • the share of assets held in hot wallets
    • privileged access controls
    • endpoint security for engineering staff
    • evidence that any self-insurance reserve actually exists and is funded
  • Look at contingent exposure. Some clients hold operating funds on exchanges or accept crypto payments. A freeze like this one is a business interruption and liquidity event even when the client itself was not hacked.

A growing pattern

This attack follows Bitget’s loss of roughly US$350 million in September. TRM Labs says North Korea-linked groups took about 76% of all crypto hack value in the first four months of this year.

Tim Sun, senior researcher at Hong Kong’s HashKey Group, told Reuters the breach could prompt investors to reassess counterparty, solvency and liquidity risk at centralised exchanges. Kevin March, co-founder of JPEG Trading, told The Wall Street Journal he expects the loss to be manageable for Binance. Very few exchanges could absorb a loss on this scale.

Read next: AI as a risk amplifier: how cyber insurance is evolving

Free newsletter

We'll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up - to - date with the world of Insurance. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from IB AU.