‘Incumbent’ insurers struggling to keep up with new market entrants

‘Incumbent’ insurers struggling to keep up with new market entrants

‘Incumbent’ insurers struggling to keep up with new market entrants New market entrants are changing the competitive landscape and using technology to transform the traditional insurance business model and “incumbent” insurers are struggling to keep up.

This is according to a global survey of 321 insurers – including a third from Asia-Pacific – conducted by the Economic Intelligence Unit. It found that 86 per cent of insurers are still challenged by legacy IT issues, with 93 per cent saying they need a new IT infrastructure to integrate and manage data and only 38 per cent are “very effective” at turning multiple data sources into “actionable insights”.

The survey was conducted in conjunction with financial services company State Street. Pete Thurmond, State Street’s head of insurance sector solutions in North America for State Street, urged insurer to turn data “from a liability into an asset”.

He added: “However, misaligned objectives may be holding insurers back with only 28 per cent of respondents agreeing that their technology and business goals are in synch. To access new client segments and counteract new tech and data-driven competitors, it will become increasingly important for insurers to focus on collecting and analysing data to understand consumer behaviours and deliver tailored products that match those needs.”

On a positive note, the report found that to meet that demand and access new customer segments, 58 per cent of insurers are investing in customer relationship management systems, 57 per cent are investing in social media tools and 50 per cent are investing in technology to capture new customer insights.

Respondents spoke of their plans to expand their investments into alternatives (21 per cent) and emerging market equities (53 per cent). However, less than two thirds (58 per cent) are very confident their current technology and operating platforms can support these changes to investment strategy and only nine percent rank as “excellent” their ability to integrate investment data from multiple sources to achieve a comprehensive portfolio view.

The report suggests part of the problem is the cultural divide separating the IT function from the rest of the business. Only 36 per cent of respondents who identify as business managers agree that technology managers are flexible in the face of changing business needs and 22 per cent strongly agree that technology managers are proactive in proposing new, innovative solutions.

Around 26 per cent of respondents who identify as technology managers strongly agree that business managers readily take advantage of new technologies, and only 18 per cent agree that senior leaders in their company give technical initiatives the priority they deserve.

“To bridge the digital divide, both technology and business managers must be proactive in proposing innovative solutions, prioritising technology advancements and offering actionable data and to support these changes to investment strategy,” Thurmond concluded.
 
5 Comments
  • Damo 13/10/2014 10:30:09 AM
    Australia is so far behind other major countries when it comes to IT technology, in both the insurer and broker space, it really is laughable.

    Rather than design user friendly systems across the board which everyone can operate, we are in a ruck whereby most brokers pass even the most relatively easy processing tasks onto assistants as the IT software is so dreadful.

    Why do we continue using the same old painful timestaking IT systems? The answer is because we have always used them, and there are no adequate alternatives at the minute.

    Take a trip to the US, London, France and have a look at their IT, you really wont believe your eyes, and in the long run I know from personal experience that cost efficiency will be obtained as well as reducing processing time and improving the overall look of documents.
    Post a reply
  • Rob 13/10/2014 11:10:12 AM
    Is WinBeat really the best we have? Ugh!
    Post a reply
  • Robert Cooper 13/10/2014 1:34:41 PM
    The main reason we chose NAS Insurance Brokers to team up with and become a corporate authorised representative of them was due to their great IT Systems and constant striving to improve them from their dedicated IT staff they employ. Because the rest of the market's Broking software systems are so archaic.
    From what I have seen, many Insurers systems are not much better.
    Post a reply