The Australian insurance industry spends up to $3.5 billion a year on regulatory compliance. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has now publicly committed to stop adding to that load – and the downstream effects for brokers are more concrete than the regulatory language suggests.
APRA published its latest APRA Explains article on September 24, 2026, setting out progress under its “Getting the balance right” strategic agenda. The update covers changes already made across the insurance, banking, and superannuation sectors, along with what the regulator plans to do next.
The headline commitment: APRA says its 2026-27 measures are designed to offset the burden of any new requirements it introduces, aiming for a broadly net neutral regulatory impact overall.
That is not a standard regulatory position.
The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) put numbers to the compliance burden in its November 2025 Cost of Regulatory Burden report. Regulatory compliance costs the industry between $2.5 billion and $3.5 billion annually – equivalent to 4% to 6% of gross written premium.
More than 30,000 obligations, enforced by 25 authorities across 300 regulatory instruments, underpin that figure.
In a November 2025 letter to the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR), the ICA stated its position plainly: the goal is “not less regulation, but better regulation – rules that safeguard customers without unnecessary complexity or cost.”
ICA CEO Andrew Hall described the October 2025 roundtable as a “timely and important conversation” with APRA, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and industry leaders, adding that “discussions like this are critical in ensuring we can continue to drive our industry forward.”
National Insurance Brokers Association (NIBA) CEO Richard Klipin has described the cumulative effect in terms brokers will recognise. In Drova’s Insurance Outlook Report 2026, he said: “In reality, it’s one plus one plus one plus one, and over many years you layer on lots of regulation. It becomes complex, it becomes costly, it becomes difficult to manage – and clients can get confused.”
Read next: APRA sharpens insurer scrutiny on AI, cyber and climate risk
The reinsurance framework is the most concrete change for general insurers, and it is already locked in. On July 7, 2026, APRA finalised amendments to the general insurance reinsurance framework. The final standards take effect on January 1, 2027. A key change is an expanded role for the Appointed Actuary, who can now determine the capital treatment of certain reinsurance arrangements – reducing the volume of matters that previously required referral to APRA.
APRA Member Suzanne Smith said at the time: “The amendments modernise the prudential framework and give insurers greater flexibility to access reinsurance arrangements, while maintaining appropriate safeguards for policyholders. They also reduce regulatory burden and make the framework more efficient as reinsurance markets evolve.”
APRA noted the review commenced during a period of significant pressure in reinsurance markets. Conditions have since eased – Australia’s commercial insurance market remained soft through the first half of 2026, with reinsurance conditions stabilising and insurer appetite remaining broad, according to EBM Insurance & Risk’s May 2026 market report. APRA said the updated framework is intended to function effectively across the full market cycle, not just when conditions are favourable.
For brokers, reduced referral requirements in reinsurance access gives insurers more flexibility in how they structure their programs – flexibility that tends to support capacity and pricing stability in commercial and specialty lines.
APRA has also finalised reduced capital requirements for annuity products. The changes are designed to bring Australian settings closer to those in other jurisdictions and make competitive pricing more achievable for life insurers.
APRA has been measured in its expectations, stating the changes are not expected to transform the Australian annuity market – but that they should facilitate more competitive pricing without increasing risks for policyholders.
Australia has historically had low uptake of guaranteed income streams relative to comparable markets. The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) reported the superannuation system managed approximately $4.1 trillion in assets as of March 2025. Even incremental improvement in retirement income product availability carries weight for brokers and advisers operating in that space.
The “Getting the balance right” article is not APRA’s only recent commitment on burden reduction. In July 2026, APRA published a Statement of Intent in response to the Commonwealth Government’s Statement of Expectations. In it, APRA committed to streamlining information and data requests, simplifying processes, addressing duplication, and – notably – publishing key performance indicators that demonstrate how it is minimising undue burden for industry.
Public KPIs on burden reduction move the commitment from policy language to something that can be measured and held to account.
“When APRA talks about reducing unnecessary regulatory burden, we do not mean lowering standards. Our goal is to make sure regulation is targeted, proportionate, and effective, so banks, insurers, and superannuation funds remain safe and resilient without adding unnecessary cost or complexity,” Smith said in the September 24 publication.
Read next: APRA’s chair just linked AI to cyber risk. World’s top regulator just said the same thing
APRA reported sharing 30% more data with external stakeholders over the past 12 months, reducing duplicate requests to regulated entities.
The ICA’s November 2025 report illustrated the practical problem this work addresses. When a cyber incident occurs, an insurer must notify APRA within 72 hours, ASIC within 30 days, and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) on a separate timeline – each with different definitions and post-incident documentation requirements.
One event. Three separate regulatory processes.
Further work is underway, including a broader policy simplification package and ongoing reforms under the Financial Accountability Regime (FAR).
“‘Getting the balance right’ is not about choosing between safety and efficiency. Good prudential regulation should deliver both: a resilient financial system that protects Australians’ financial interests and a targeted, proportionate, and practical regulatory framework that avoids undue cost for industry,” APRA said.
