The challenge of assessing climate risk

Three scenarios are taking centre stage

The challenge of assessing climate risk

Columns

By Tim Grafton

Major insurers operating in Aotearoa New Zealand are to be among the first in the world to be mandated to make climate related disclosures. The Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2021 is on track to come into effect for financial years commencing in 2023.

Under it, insurers, and all major financial institutions including banks, are required to disclose the risks they face as a result of climate change. Doing so should better inform investment decisions that support the transition to a low carbon economy, encourage innovation and action to cut carbon emissions. This is essential if we are to maintain the provision of insurance as we know it today in the face of an already well-established trend of increasing climate hazards and related risks.

While insurers are in the business of calculating risk and pricing it accordingly, the challenge of assessing the drivers of climate risk through many social, economic, political and environmental perspectives, and how they impact the insurance value chain, is new.

Financial reporting is understandably done against well-established rules and standards. In this case, these have had to been created from scratch, albeit against the backdrop of the work of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). Final guidance on the reporting standard is expected from Te Kāwai Ārahi Pūrongo Mōwaho External Reporting Board (XRB) in December.

The use of scenarios will be central to reporting. Scenarios are a very useful tool against which potential outcomes can be assessed. It’s important to note that they are not forecasts of what will happen, rather they are a set of plausible and coherent narratives that might arise under certain circumstances.

The insurance sector has taken the lead in developing its own set of robust scenarios. By having a shared view of the scenario landscape, individual insurers can assess the risks and opportunities for their own businesses through that lens. This will support consistent and comparable climate change disclosures and support insurers to integrate climate impacts into their strategic thinking enabling them to be more resilient.

Our three scenarios are: an orderly transition to net zero by 2050, a disorderly transition and a hot-house world where too little is done too late. Each scenario is looked at over the short, medium and long-term.

As others within the finance sector do the same, for example banking, then a clearer picture will emerge of how the financial sector as a whole sees the future and each which will influence others’ views as all continually reassess the scenarios. This will help support best practise reporting and better understanding of how to manage change.

The primary user of climate disclosures are investors which includes insurers. That is critical because, if we are serious about transitioning to a net zero world, then the world must undergo fundamental change over the next two decades. That means investment will need to shift away from high carbon emitting activities to low carbon ones.

That transition needs to happen in a way that avoids harmful volatility in the financial sector and instead attracts investors’ funds to finance the transition. This requires future climate related financial risks to be adequately priced and reported transparently and consistently.

Investors need to understand how reporting entities intend to navigate, over the short to long term horizons, the impacts of climate change. They need to see the metrics that demonstrate, or otherwise, that progress is being made. Where data is not available, they need to understand what is being done to address that and the judgements that are being applied.

Related Stories

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!