New Jersey top court says insurance brokers face consumer-fraud liability
And the state's fraud law lets plaintiffs collect triple damages
New Jersey top court says insurance brokers face consumer-fraud liability
RISK, COMPLIANCE & LEGAL
By Regielyn Santiago
31 Jul 2026

Insurance brokers in New Jersey just lost a legal shield. The state's top court says they can now face consumer-fraud claims - and triple damages. 

In a unanimous decision on July 15, 2026, the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that insurance brokers, producers and agents are not exempt from the state's Consumer Fraud Act. 

Brokers had long relied on a carve-out. A 2006 appeals ruling treated them as "semi-professionals" who were "excluded from liability under the CFA for the services they render within the scope of their professional licenses." That shielded them from one of the country's toughest consumer-protection laws - one that lets winning plaintiffs recover treble, or triple, damages. 

The court shut that door. Brokers, it said, are not among the narrow group historically recognized as "learned" professionals, such as physicians and attorneys. They could already advertise when the law took effect, so they never sat outside it. Being licensed was not enough, either, and the court found no "direct, unavoidable conflict" between the fraud law and broker regulation. It noted a low bar to entry: a 20-hour state-approved course per license type, with no high school diploma required. 

The case began with a disability policy. A neurosurgeon bought coverage through two brokers at the Creative Financial Group (CFG) between 2003 and 2016. He alleged they promised maximum benefits if he became disabled and never warned that his unrelated business interests could shrink a payout. 

In 2021, a permanent vision condition ended his ability to operate. He claimed maximum benefits; the insurers paid only part, citing those outside interests. He sued, alleging the brokers had breached the fraud act by failing to secure enough coverage. 

A trial judge dismissed that claim and an appeals court agreed. The Supreme Court reversed, vacated the dismissal and sent the case back. 

None of this has been decided on the merits. The court accepted the neurosurgeon's account only because the case arrived on a motion to dismiss, and no court has ruled on whether the brokers did anything wrong. What the ruling settles is this: New Jersey insurance brokers can now be sued under the Consumer Fraud Act. 

Related Stories
Free newsletter

We'll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up - to - date with the world of Insurance. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from IB US.