Travelers facing discrimination lawsuit

Travelers facing discrimination lawsuit

Travelers facing discrimination lawsuit A federal judge has ruled that the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) has standing to bring a discrimination claim against Travelers Insurance under the Fair Housing Act.

NFHA filed its suit in Washington, alleging that the insurer had committed racial, sexual and source-of-income discrimination by refusing to provide insurance to apartment owners renting to Section 8 tenants under the federal Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program.

Celebrate excellence in insurance. Nominate a worthy colleague for the Insurance Business Awards!

The alliance said Travelers’ policy affects black people and women the hardest, alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act.

“Ninety-two percent of HCV-participating households in the District are African American and 81% are female-headed households,” the NFHA said in its website. “Residents who participate in the HCV program are largely concentrated in four census tracts east of the Anacostia River. These tracts are 84.7% black, compared to the D.C. average, which is 51.1% black.”

Courthouse News Service reported that US District Judge John Bates refused Travelers’ motion to dismiss the suit on Monday.

Bates ruled that the NFHA’s claims meet the “robust causality” requirement under the US Supreme Court’s Inclusive Communities Project decision of 2015. The judge said that the alliance sufficiently alleged that the insurer’s policy unreasonably harms the groups of people most likely to be HCV program participants.

NFHA also sufficiently claimed that since these groups are “over-represented” among Section 8 participants, “members of a protected class are more likely to be harmed by Travelers’ policy than are other individuals” in the District.

Related stories:
Insurance agency president wins LGBTQ recognition
Major carrier worsens racial segregation with coverage denials, lawsuit alleges

  • Tim 8/24/2017 8:37:12 AM
    Is there an agency that mandates renters must purchase insurance from Travelers? If not, then consumers can buy insurance from another company. Travelers has assessed a premium to renters insurance commensurate to the risk that they are taking by underwriting the insured. That is not discrimination, that is risk assessment. When will lawyers cease and desist from pinning the blame on high insurance premiums on the insurance companies? Legal fees, exorbitant judgements against the insurance companies and consumer fraud drive premiums higher and higher every year. Yet most seem ignorant or apathetic to the real problem, and they are content hoping that one day a judgement like that will be rewarded to them. We have become a ridiculous society, pinning our hopes and dreams on obtaining income we did not earn to live a lifestyle we do not deserve.
    Post a reply
  • Glenn 8/24/2017 8:44:27 AM
    Post a reply
  • 8/24/2017 9:31:24 AM
    The problem here also is.. The class action will fill the pockets of the lawyers and the wronged will get squat. Don't you just love it when the government fines the wrong doer and the people who are wronged get very little. If the fathers of these children were held accountable instead of the mother being left to take care of the children then none of this would have happened to begin with.. Blame it on everyone else except yourself and your life style..
    Post a reply