Texas Supreme Court rejects Nautilus challenge on surplus-lines premiums

Texas's top court turns away Nautilus's push to limit who can accept surplus-lines premium payments, leaving compliance questions hanging for insurers

Texas Supreme Court rejects Nautilus challenge on surplus-lines premiums

Risk, Compliance & Legal

By Matthew Sellers

The Texas Supreme Court decided not to review a ruling that could leave surplus-lines insurers in Texas navigating some tricky uncertainty over how premium payments are handled. 

The case, Nautilus Insurance Company v. HOF Partners LLC, started with a basic but important question: Who is actually allowed to collect premium payments for a surplus-lines policy in Texas? Nautilus argued that the law is clear - under Chapter 981 of the Texas Insurance Code, only a registered surplus-lines agent has that authority. The company said allowing others to collect premiums would undermine the structure designed to keep surplus-lines transactions in check. 

But the Second Court of Appeals didn’t see it that way. Instead, it applied a general provision from another part of the Insurance Code and found there was a fact issue about whether the insured’s retail agent could have accepted the premium on behalf of Nautilus. That means the case could go back to the trial court to sort out who was right about that payment. 

Nautilus, backed by amicus briefs from several insurance industry groups, urged the state’s high court to take another look. Those groups, representing hundreds of insurers, warned that the appellate court’s decision might create serious disruption in the surplus-lines market. They argued that insurers could face greater costs and less predictability if anyone beyond registered surplus-lines agents can accept premiums. 

Despite those concerns, the Texas Supreme Court denied Nautilus’s petition for review and its motion for rehearing. Two justices said they would have heard the case, noting the legal questions deserve full consideration. But the majority let the lower court’s ruling stand - at least for now. 

There weren’t any insurance policy clauses at issue here. The fight was all about how the Texas Insurance Code applies to surplus-lines premium collection. For insurers and agents, that leaves an important compliance question hanging, and all eyes will be on how other courts in Texas handle similar disputes down the road. 

Related Stories

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!